We see that from one test to another the gap with the theory can vary. Even if it was each time without wind! the temperature of the last 15 days was no longer 20 °C but rather between 13 and 15 °C. So this can influence the performance of the tires! that of the transmission but also vary the SCX because I could have an extra layer! So we have to compare the wheels between them and The recap their gaps on the same day.
Then make an average of these gaps
When the wheels can be compared on other days.
First important point! the wheels do not stand out between country email list continuous and split climbs. If one of them is better on the train! it remains so on split. So even by placing accelerations of 400 w over 5 s in the biggest test making my speed go from 20 to 33 km/h on 6% and repeated 8x! no wheels manage to gain time compared to another between the 2 types of tests. I refer directly to the studies done by The recap Adrien on the subject and having to do accelerations from 0 to 30 km/H to highlight a few things.
Second point! by having new and high-end tires or tubulars on all the wheels! the gap has really narrowed. We get a 6w difference between a pair of 990g carbon wheels equipped with Veloflex carbon tubulars and a 2kg Fulcrum equipped with GP4000s.
There are 2 watts better for the RAR Svelt
On the LW but obviously in hindsight it would be necessary to use the same top content marketing trends you need to know tubulars to really compare. While searching on the net I found the following study images/AFM_tire_testing_rev7.pdf ) which compares the efficiency on the bench of tires/tubulars. There would be 1.5 w of higher efficiency with the veloflex. This seems consistent with my results. We would therefore have carbon wheels with very similar efficiency. Weighing the same and malaysia numbers list certainly not being heavy enough to detect their limit! this seems consistent.