The “symptoms-drugs” health paradigm is far from putting people’s health first

few years ago, my mother was diagnosed with colon cancer. During one of my is far from visits to my oncologist, I aske her if it would be is far from convenient to take vitamin D supplements. Her answer was very simple: “There is no Category A evidence for vitamin D against cancer.” For those who don’t know, I’ll tell you that Category A evidence requires meta-analyses and systematic reviews of high-quality clinical trials with extremely low risk of bias. . This requirement involves billions of dollars of research that must then be amortize, and vitamin D clearly cannot meet this requirement. Of course: who would be in conducting such research on generic substances? The thing is, for my mother, only medication worke.

Well that’s not all

They also gave him a cancer patient’s handbook, which openly recommended that if he had a stomachache, he drink Coca-Cola. As for the food, they told him he didn’t to see anything and he could eat whatever he want. An absolute Indonesia Mobile Database distortion of the health paradigm Please forgive me for starting this post with a personal reference. But this seems to me the best way to approach this reflection: How could science be so tainted? What do medical universities teach? How could we be so brainwash, not just us but the health professionals as well? Understanding how we got here is crucial, especially at a time like this where we are watching the pharmaceutical industry race against time to capture the spoils of Covid-19. The current health paradigm: Does it still make sense? Now I want to introduce two names.

Asia Mobile Number List

The two were scientific contemporaries and worked together

They are even teachers and students. The student is world-famous and has streets, buildings, awards and organizations name after him. The professor’s ideas, on the other hand, have not to posterity. I’m talking to you about Louis Pasteur and Morocco Phone Number List his teacher Antoine Béchamp. The latter said that a previous change in the state of the body to the arrival of the bacteria. Pasteur, on the other hand, thought it was bacteria that made us sick. Years pass and today, Béchamp does not even appear in “Trifles” and Pasteur is known as the father of modern . Let’s put ourselves in a situation and go back to the first years of the century. It was clear from the start that the socioeconomic interests of the emerging pharmaceutical industry were more receptive to the idea that bacteria were to blame. If it’s the other way around, we have to focus on taking care of our bodies and staying healthy through correct lifestyle habits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *